Photo Attribution: US Presswire
OKC Dave is our statistician extraordinaire. He posts often (and intelligently) on OSU football and hoops.
Marcus Smart certainly passes the eye test, but I wondered how he stacked up against former OSU players statistically — and what that might mean for this basketball team.
I calculated the efficiency rating for each player in the Sutton/Ford era. A player’s efficiency rating is easy to calculate from a box score:
[(Points + Rebounds + Assists + Steals + Blocks - FG missed - FT missed - Turnovers) / Game]
It’s not perfect, but it’s a quick and easy way to put together everything a player does on the court that can be recorded. You should know that it is biased towards big men because it rewards a higher shooting percentage and they typically are able to grab rebounds easier than guards.
To get an idea of what a “good” efficiency rating is, here’s a list of the top 3 players in efficiency rating in the Sutton/Ford era, excluding this season.
The average leading efficiency rating in the Sutton/Ford era is 18.6. If you add up the top 3 players each year, the average is 45.5.
Here’s where it gets interesting. In years where OSU made the NCAA Tournament, the average for the top player is 20.0. The average of the top 3 players in those seasons is 48.9. In seasons where OSU did not make the dance, the average for the top player is 15.7. The average for the top 3 players in those seasons is 38.3.
So how do the 2013 Cowboys stack up? Smart currently has an efficiency rating of 18.5, which is just about average for the top player in each season – but it’s worth noting that he is well above average if you take out the Houston/Reeves seasons. 18.5 would be 5th-highest total in the post-Reeves era, behind only Baker, JA, Boggan, and Mason.
How about the top 3 this year? They are Smart (18.5), Brown (13.7), and Nash (10.8). Add them up and you get 43.0. This is…well…not very good. It would be 15th among the 23 seasons in the Sutton/Ford era. It is just about halfway between the tournament-season average and the NIT-season average. To put it simply…Smart needs some help. Here’s a chart showing the top 3 leaders in efficiency rating by season. Years OSU made the dance are highlighted in orange.
Our current team reminds me a lot of the 2002 and 2003 teams that finished in the top third of the Big 12 and made the tournament. Those teams didn’t have the best talent in the conference, but they played extremely hard and gutted out several close games with defensive stops and (gulp) excellent coaching. I hope this 2013 team can replicate that formula.
Given that these stats are biased toward big men, goes to show you that we were successful when we had better big men (and not coincidentally also had higher efficiency numbers).
’94 Big Country, ’91 Byron Houston, ’10 James Anderson, ’01 Mo Baker and ’94 Brooks Thompson would be one hell of a lineup
I’d sub Randy for JA. James may have had a higher efficiency rating, but there wouldn’t be anyone better than Randy to drain jumpers from the corner.
I would gladly make that substitution
Is it bad that I laughed out loud and nodded my head pretty vigorously when I read the “gulp” in your last sentence?
Thanks for an excellent post. How do our team efficiency numbers compare to past teams?
Just about where the top 3 numbers indicate. Somewhere in the middle of our “good” teams and our “bad” teams. I’ll follow up later this season on this topic, but as of now the jury is still out on this team. The good news is that our defense will make up for the some of the offensive shortcomings.